This post documents how to migrate a blog from Blogger to Docusaurus.

Managed Identity offers a very secure way for applications running in Azure to connect to Azure SQL databases. It's an approach that does not require code changes; merely configuration of connection string and associated resources. Hence it has a good developer experience. Importantly, it allows us to avoid exposing our database to username / password authentication, and hence making it a tougher target for bad actors.

Generating clients for APIs is a tremendous way to reduce the amount of work you have to do when you're building a project. Why handwrite that code when it can be auto-generated for you quickly and accurately by a tool like NSwag? To quote the docs:

I've written lately about zero downtime releases with Azure App Service. Zero downtime releases are only successful if your authentication mechanism survives a new deployment. We looked in my last post at how to achieve this with Azure's in-built authentication mechanism; Easy Auth.

I wrote recently about zero downtime deployments on Azure App Service. Many applications require authentication, and ours is no exception. In our case we're using Azure Active Directory facilitated by "Easy Auth" which provides authentication to our App Service.

I've been working recently on zero downtime deployments using Azure App Service. They're facilitated by a combination of Health checks and deployment slots. This post will talk about why this is important and how it works.

This post is about Azure's role assignments and ARM templates. Role assignments can be thought of as "permissions for Azure".

If you're deploying an ASP.NET application to Azure App Services / Azure Container Apps or similar, there's a decent chance you'll also be using the fantastic Serilog and will want to plug it into Azure's Application Insights.

How do you answer the question: "what version of my application is running in Production right now?" This post demonstrates how to surface the build metadata that represents the version of your app, from your app using Azure Pipelines and ASP.NET.

I wrote recently about how to get Azure App Service Easy Auth to work with roles. This involved borrowing the approach used by MaximeRouiller.Azure.AppService.EasyAuth.

As a consequence of writing that post I came to learn that official support for Azure Easy Auth had landed in October 2020 in v1.2 of Microsoft.Identity.Web. This was great news; I was delighted.

However, it turns out that the same authorization issue that MaximeRouiller.Azure.AppService.EasyAuth suffers from, is visited upon Microsoft.Identity.Web as well. This post shows hoew to resolve it with IClaimsTransformation.

Azure App Service has a feature which is intended to allow Authentication and Authorization to be applied outside of your application code. It's called "Easy Auth". Unfortunately, in the context of App Services it doesn't work with .NET Core and .NET. Perhaps it would be better to say: of the various .NETs, it supports .NET Framework. To quote the docs:

At this time, ASP.NET Core does not currently support populating the current user with the Authentication/Authorization feature. However, some 3rd party, open source middleware components do exist to help fill this gap.

Thanks to Maxime Rouiller there's a way forward here. However, as I was taking this for a spin today, I discovered another issue.

react-query has a weakly typed hook named useQueries. It's possible to turn that into a strong typed hook; this post shows you how.

Create React App is a fantastic way to get up and running building a web app with React. It also supports using TypeScript with React. Simply entering the following:

This post explains how to integrate the tremendous test runner Jest with the continuous integration platform Azure Pipelines. Perhaps we're setting up a new project and we've created a new React app with Create React App. This ships with Jest support out of the box. How do we get that plugged into Pipelines such that:

1. Tests run as part of our pipeline
2. A failing test fails the build
3. Test results reported in Azure Pipelines UI

Related: there is a post on Vitest and Azure Pipelines.

Consistent formatting in a codebase is a good thing. We can achieve this in dotnet using dotnet format, used in combination with the npm packages husky and lint-staged. This post shows how.

By default Microsoft.Identity.Web responds to unauthorized requests with a 302 (redirect). Do you want a 403 (forbidden) instead? Here's how.

'Tis the season to play with new compiler settings! I'm a very keen TypeScript user and have been merrily using strictNullChecks since it shipped. I was dimly aware that C# was also getting a similar feature by the name of nullable reference types.

Some blog posts are insightful treatises on the future of web development, some are "here's how I solved my problem". This is most assuredly the latter.

I'm writing an custom pipelines task extension for Azure Pipelines. It's written with TypeScript and the azure-pipelines-task-lib.

I've recently found myself developing custom pipelines task extensions for Azure DevOps. The extensions being developed end up in the Azure DevOps Marketplace. What you see there when you look at existing extensions is some pretty lovely documentation.

Never neglect the possibilities of a code review. There are times when you raise a PR and all you want is for everyone to hit approve so you can merge, merge and ship, ship! This can be a missed opportunity. For as much as I'd like to imagine my code is perfect, it's patently not. There's always scope for improvement.